Its been experience and the majority of people saying otherwise are cherry picking.

Based on what evidence ?

OK fair enough but I still think the church is far more sympathetic then given credit for.

In my experience there is very little harsh language. People who talk on and on about this come across as trying to pick a fight.

You say that

The Catechism does not refer to depravity or disorderedness when discussing homosexuality.

This is just wrong. David gave you the quote in short. Here it is in full.

2357 Homosexuality refers to relations between men or between women who experience an exclusive or predominant sexual attraction toward persons of the same sex. It has taken a great variety of forms through the centuries and in different cultures. Its psychological genesis remains largely unexplained. Basing itself on Sacred Scripture, which presents homosexual acts as acts of grave depravity,141 tradition has always declared that "homosexual acts are intrinsically disordered."142 They are contrary to the natural law. They close the sexual act to the gift of life. They do not proceed from a genuine affective and sexual complementarity. Under no circumstances can they be approved.

It is unclear to me what point you are trying to make. Are you claiming that the Church does not use harsh language to condemn homosexuality?

I think are cherry picking. Grave depravity is a highly specialised word arrangement.

Please note that I said the following:

In fact, if you do a google search of the entire Vatican web site for the words "grave depravity" ("grave depravity" site:vatican.va) you will find onlyreferences to homosexuality.

I even gave the correct form for the Google search:

"grave depravity" site:vatican.va

The Catechism does not refer to depravity or disorderedness when discussing homosexuality. I searched the Vatican site for depravity and its getting all sorts of hits and it is not correct to say you only references to homosexuality.

If by that you mean moving paedophiles around so they could find new
victims and not reporting them to the police you are correct.

Yes, that's what I mean.

But tying this back to the subject of this discussion (and since you apparently want to drop the subject of bestiality/necrophilia), do you not think that pedophilia is disordered in any way? Are such actions wrong only because of the negative consequences experienced by the victims?