极速赛车168官网 Comments on: On Proving God

极速赛车168官网 By: Charles Pruett

Charles Pruett — Thu, 03 Sep 2015 12:25:00 +0000

Exploregod.com is SOOOO demonic it's palpable to one actually inspired by GOD (yes, He DOES exist) This supposed "movement" of atheism is driven by Lucifer, perverse minds and nefarious groups of the ultra wealthy that are NOT, surprise surprise, "atheist", per se, but they actually believe Lucifer is the rightful heir, and not Christ! You are terribly deceived by your natural minds. You cannot "prove" God exists by empirical means. The Savior (yes, that's Jesus Christ) taught, "...it us an adulterous and wicked generation that seeks signs," of the things of God. Otherwise, what place does Faith have in our lives? Repent of this FALSE notion that there is no God. I KNOW God lives. I KNOW Jesus is the Christ. I proclaim it to you in His sacred name, even Jesus Christ. Amen.

极速赛车168官网 By: Dan Morgan

Dan Morgan — Tue, 10 Dec 2013 19:50:00 +0000

In reply to Pamela Wilson. I would say your boyfriend has got big things in Christianity ahead of him. If you are both growing closer to God, you can not help but to get closer to each other. As for physical proof, look around you. Looks like the creation story was right. Oh the timing was recorded wrong? Yea, lets focus on that rather than there being a creation, therefore, logically, and scientifically, there is a creator!!

极速赛车168官网 By: Randy Gritter

Randy Gritter — Tue, 10 Dec 2013 16:04:00 +0000

In reply to Steven Carr. Sounds more like Thor! Seriously, these stories are data but they don't prove a lot about God. So what? If the essential question is whether anything supernatural exists then this story leans towards the Yes side. You still have the real work of sorting through all the claims and counter-claims about God and figuring out which makes the most sense. If you were afraid you would not longer use your reason, don't be. You will need it.

极速赛车168官网 By: Steven Carr

Steven Carr — Tue, 10 Dec 2013 13:04:00 +0000

In reply to Pamela Wilson. So Zeus exists after all!

极速赛车168官网 By: Pamela Wilson

Pamela Wilson — Tue, 10 Dec 2013 12:59:00 +0000

My boyfriend used to be a non believer. He would make fun of me for my Christianity, and sometimes would be hurtful and snide with his remarks towards me. One night I don't remember what started the conversation/argument, but he got angry and stomped out of our apartment. It was a hot clear summer night, He got to the car and he said that he looked up to the sky and said angrily "Alright damned you, If you exist. PROVE IT!" Next thing I know he, my boyfriend is coming back into the apartment soaking wet with a stunned look on his face, and he told me what he had said, then he said lightening struck not more that 5 feet from him and it started raining so hard that he was soaked before he could open the car door. Funny thing is I never heard a thing, no thunder, or the lightening striking the parking lot right outside our apartment. I never even heard the rain, but the next morning my boyfriend was showing me in the parking lot where the lightening struck and there was a big crack and hole in the pavement. He became a believer after that, and went on to be saved! PRAISE GOD!

极速赛车168官网 By: felixcox

felixcox — Mon, 21 Oct 2013 00:33:00 +0000

In reply to Alden Smith. A video is not a rebuttal. I'll respond to comments, not videos of people who can make improbable claims and get away with it unchallenged. I'll exercise the golden rule and not refer you to the hundreds of vids that demonstrate my point of view. I can represent myself.

极速赛车168官网 By: felixcox

felixcox — Mon, 21 Oct 2013 00:30:00 +0000

In reply to Alden Smith. So now you declare I'm a "hyper skeptic" because I simply ask for stronger evidence than ancient hearsay. If you were intellectually honest, you'd concede that you are a "hyper skeptic" because you disbelieve in the hundreds and hundreds of accounts of non-biblical miracles around the world. As I said, you suspend your normally-sound judgment when it comes to evaluating all miracles except for one. But based on NOTHING BUT ANCIENT HEARSAY. I'm a rationalist, so of course that's not enough to persuade me. We are very different. You can keep posting videos of selective-fundamentalists who claim that ancient hearsay is indeed more probable than the other obvious and ordinary explanations for christianity's origins and rapid growth. It's a pattern that has occurred on every continent across hudreds of distinct cultures, so yeah, there are VERY good explanations that don't involve magic. Whatever floats your boat. If you can call me a "hyper skeptic," are you comfortable with me labeling you in a similar fashion?

极速赛车168官网 By: Alden Smith

Alden Smith — Sun, 20 Oct 2013 23:26:00 +0000

In reply to felixcox. I see that you are a hyper skeptic. Now what criteria would you use to determine what is "extraordinary evidence" and what is not? What kind of evidence would qualify as extraordinary?

极速赛车168官网 By: Alden Smith

Alden Smith — Sun, 20 Oct 2013 23:21:00 +0000

In reply to felixcox.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5znVUFHqO4Q

极速赛车168官网 By: Guest

Guest — Sun, 20 Oct 2013 23:18:00 +0000

In reply to felixcox.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ay_Db4RwZ_M