Walking on water sounds like a failure of the laws of physics.

or are just making out of fool me again?

so the evidence, 'lfe comes from existing life'.. is not refutable... it's on your part to provide your evidence that 'life evolve from non-life'

then tell me!

Until you produce some evidence for your claims, I don't have to tell you anything except that you're wrong.

I do. This entire post does not tell me what you want an example of.

why not read my entire posts?

then tell me! i don't have to say it again!

i only knew that only 'life comes from existing life'.. which science says and supports

You have made it obvious that you don't know what science says and supports.

just make an argument that life evolved from lifeless matter.

I will, but not until you give me the title of a book, written by a scientist, in which the author explicitly states that life cannot evolve from lifeless matter.

the burden of proof is in your shoulder.

You made a claim about what science says, and I have denied your claim. If you can make the claim without evidence, then I can deny it without evidence.

can you evaluate the 'truthfulness' of your claim . . . .

We all do that every time we assert a claim. Whenever we assert anything, we must have evaluated it to be true.

just only one example..

What are you asking for an example of?

can you evaluate the 'truthfulness' of your claim that life evolve from lifeless matter? just only one example..

evaluate it thru experimentations.