极速赛车168官网 Comments on: Introducing Bernard Lonergan’s Philosophical Proof for God https://strangenotions.com/introducing-bernard-lonergans-philosophical-proof-for-god/ A Digital Areopagus // Reason. Faith. Dialogue. Sat, 18 Jun 2022 11:19:00 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.1 极速赛车168官网 By: murrayzz1 https://strangenotions.com/introducing-bernard-lonergans-philosophical-proof-for-god/#comment-227276 Sat, 18 Jun 2022 11:19:00 +0000 http://strangenotions.com/?p=5785#comment-227276 This article demonstrates a lack of understanding of what "infinity" means. An infinite series of caused realities would, by definition, have no beginning.

]]>
极速赛车168官网 By: Dwane Anderson https://strangenotions.com/introducing-bernard-lonergans-philosophical-proof-for-god/#comment-197034 Tue, 19 Feb 2019 15:33:00 +0000 http://strangenotions.com/?p=5785#comment-197034 It seems like he didn't finish the argument. He only "proved" that reality is intelligible. He didn't explain how an intelligible reality proves that God exists.

]]>
极速赛车168官网 By: Alexandra https://strangenotions.com/introducing-bernard-lonergans-philosophical-proof-for-god/#comment-152946 Thu, 29 Oct 2015 19:29:00 +0000 http://strangenotions.com/?p=5785#comment-152946 In reply to Michael Murray.

Aw, thanks for that. :)

]]>
极速赛车168官网 By: Paul Brandon Rimmer https://strangenotions.com/introducing-bernard-lonergans-philosophical-proof-for-god/#comment-152912 Thu, 29 Oct 2015 14:32:00 +0000 http://strangenotions.com/?p=5785#comment-152912 In reply to billwalker.

Retrocausality is causality that works out backwards in time. Normally, people see that the billiard ball is shoved by my hand, rolls along the track, hits another billiard ball, and that billiard ball starts moving. But another way to think about that interaction is that the billiard ball moved backwards in time, hit the first billiard ball, and the billiard ball lands in my hand.

In physics, some interpret the production of particle pairs (a particle and an anti-particle) in this way. Sometimes a high energy particle of light, a photon, will produce an electron and a positron. A positron is what an electron would look like if it moved back in time. So some physicists interpret this event as:

An electron moves backwards in time, collides with a photon moving forward in time, and this scatters the electron to move forward in time.

There's even an interpretation of quantum mechanics that works along these lines. It explains why the pair production from a photon can't be predicted is because predictions are made from history. If things moving forward in time can interact with things moving backward in time, and therefore that that haven't 'started' yet, some of the interaction details can't be predicted from the particle history.

]]>
极速赛车168官网 By: Lazarus https://strangenotions.com/introducing-bernard-lonergans-philosophical-proof-for-god/#comment-152904 Thu, 29 Oct 2015 03:46:00 +0000 http://strangenotions.com/?p=5785#comment-152904 In reply to DB.

So far you have added rudeness and uncalled for unpleasantness to the discussion. Nothing else.

]]>
极速赛车168官网 By: Michael Murray https://strangenotions.com/introducing-bernard-lonergans-philosophical-proof-for-god/#comment-152896 Wed, 28 Oct 2015 23:51:00 +0000 http://strangenotions.com/?p=5785#comment-152896 In reply to Alexandra.

So I guess PC stands for Polite Catholic :-)

]]>
极速赛车168官网 By: Alexandra https://strangenotions.com/introducing-bernard-lonergans-philosophical-proof-for-god/#comment-152895 Wed, 28 Oct 2015 23:25:00 +0000 http://strangenotions.com/?p=5785#comment-152895 In reply to DB.

The name calling I was referring to was saying Paul was "Infected with... irrationality". (Perhaps I should have specified.) This is not about the use of "Hilary" specifically. Comments like Paul "avoids reality", and that he "promotes an ideology cloaked in psuedo-science" violates the guidelines. We are to engage the arguments, not the source.

"MUST READ" is capitalized in the original, no offense was intended.

This is not about parity. I was letting you know that the commenting guidelines exist, because those that violate the rule of -do not attack the source -get banned. I didn't want to see that happen to you. But now that you've called me a "PC baby"- off with your head! ;) Oh, wait, that's not very PC. :)

I think you are rushing to judgement about Paul- he is a lovely contributor here. I hope you will be too.

Edit: added words

]]>
极速赛车168官网 By: billwalker https://strangenotions.com/introducing-bernard-lonergans-philosophical-proof-for-god/#comment-152794 Wed, 28 Oct 2015 02:24:00 +0000 http://strangenotions.com/?p=5785#comment-152794 In reply to Paul Brandon Rimmer.

I'm not familiar with that word. Would you please relieve me of my ignorance ? :-)

]]>
极速赛车168官网 By: Paul Brandon Rimmer https://strangenotions.com/introducing-bernard-lonergans-philosophical-proof-for-god/#comment-152775 Tue, 27 Oct 2015 20:07:00 +0000 http://strangenotions.com/?p=5785#comment-152775 In reply to DB.

I got to shake her hand once. It was pretty cool.

]]>
极速赛车168官网 By: Alexandra https://strangenotions.com/introducing-bernard-lonergans-philosophical-proof-for-god/#comment-152772 Tue, 27 Oct 2015 18:41:00 +0000 http://strangenotions.com/?p=5785#comment-152772 In reply to DB.

Please read the commenting guidelines in the "MUST READ" section. This is a place for dialogue, not name calling.

]]>